I take issue with the comments from Nick Beach (Dec 8) concerning the use of metric measurements.

Like Mr Beach, I was educated in the Sixties, completing my A-levels in 1969.

The most troublesome aspect I found in my studies of physics and applied mathematics, was the addition of metric measurements to imperial measurements, with which I was fully familiar.

I found metric measurements thoroughly confusing then, and I still do. I have given up watching many documentary programmes where metric distances and weights are given without their imperial equivalents, since I have no concept of the sizes involved.

Some years ago in the USA, when they tried to introduce metric measurements at their petrol stations, the public showed their feelings and forced the companies to revert to gallons.

In other words, unlike Mr Beach, I believe the metric system, the metre originally being based upon an incorrect calculation by the French, to be thoroughly confusing, with so many zeroes and similarity of names. To satisfy the requirements of supporters of both systems, if we were able to improve our education system, we could ensure children in this country are taught both systems, to meet our domestic as well Continental requirements.

Ken Bennett
Royal Close
Rochford

...I have to agree with Nick Beach. I started work in 1963 and the firm I joined was using metric measurements, and within two hours it seemed like I had never known anything else.

My wife often asks how long is a metre. From the tip of your nose to the tip of asideways-stretched arm is my reply. The same as it was for a yard, and just about as accurate.

If we changed miles to kilometres, as the Irish did a few years back, 30mph would become 55kph, and 70mph would become 120kph. That equates to roughly 35mph and 80mph.

Think how much that would save a lot of people in fines.

M G Daubney
Lakeside Path
Canvey